As a result, many violations of the Fair Housing Act continue.It is a deregulation rule cloaked in affordable housing language masquerading as a fair housing rule.The Fair Housing Act, passed in 1968, seeks to end housing discrimination and promote diverse, inclusive communities by prohibiting discrimination against people seeking to rent or buy a home, obtain a mortgage, or seek housing assistance.It significantly weakens fair housing compliance, entrenches segregated housing patterns, and continues the status quo.This proposed rule is not a fair housing rule at all.“The centrality of housing to people’s opportunities and life chances guarantees that virtually every issue concerning social justice is in some way a fair housing issue.” – George LipsitzYou can help by telling the Trump administration you oppose HUD’s harmful proposal.Despite the Fair Housing Act, marginalized groups are often still excluded from access to quality and fair housing; this limits their access to good jobs, schools, transportation, and more.In 1968, when it passed the Fair Housing Act, Congress made a promise to the American people that it would end discrimination in housing based on race, national origin and certain other characteristics, and that it would eliminate racial segregation — which government itself had done so much to create and sustain — and undo the lasting harms it caused. Congress gave HUD the job of carrying out this promise. It made HUD responsible for protecting the rights of individuals seeking homes. It also told HUD to make sure that the cities, counties and states it funds do not discriminate and that they take active steps to tackle segregation. This important protection is known as Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing (AFFH). HUD failed to do this job until 2015, when it adopted the first effective AFFH regulation.AFFH is a provision of the 1968 Fair Housing Act directing HUD to make sure neither it nor the cities, counties, states, and public housing agencies it funds, discriminate in their programs. These data would seek to represent how well a jurisdiction is providing affordable, quality housing free of violations of the Fair Housing Act and related statutes. Housing discrimination still takes place, and many jurisdictions continue to allow known barriers to fair housing—such as burdensome governmental processes, the concentration of substandard housing stock in specific areas, or restrictions based on the source of a tenant's income—to exist.HUD recognizes the broad sweep of the AFFH obligation, its nature which defies easy quantification, and its susceptibility to widely diverging but reasonable interpretations.
(i) Protected choice, which means access to housing without discrimination;If you have questions for the Agency that issued the current document please contact the agency directly.The OFR/GPO partnership is committed to presenting accurate and reliable regulatory information on FederalRegister.gov with the objective of establishing the XML-based Federal Register as an ACFR-sanctioned publication in the future. The goals or obstacles identified in the certification would not need to be based on any HUD-prescribed mode of analysis, such as examining a statistical analysis of housing patterns, using any specified data set, or reflecting original research or commissioned expert opinions, but they should reflect the practical experience and local insights of the program participant in conducting its ordinary housing-related operations, both with HUD funding and other programmatic efforts.However, HUD anticipates that jurisdictions may look to common ways to increase fair housing choice in their jurisdictions. (1) Whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including whether the information will have practical utility;595 documents in the last yearHUD believes that fair housing choice exists when a jurisdiction can foster the broad availability of affordable housing that is decent, safe, and sanitary and does so without housing discrimination. In determining whether a PHA has complied with its certification, HUD will review the PHA's circumstances relevant to the specified deficiencies, including characteristics of the population served by the PHA; characteristics of the PHA's existing housing stock; and decisions, plans, goals, priorities, strategies, and actions of the PHA, including those designed to affirmatively further fair housing.The proposed rule significantly reduces the reporting burden for jurisdictions in the formulation of AFFH strategies, reducing costs by an estimated $23.7 million per year.
Vallecito Lake Web Cam, Paccar Financial Repos, Horseshoe Bay Fireworks 2020, Mcdonalds Logo Quiz, Raystown Lake Cabins, Middle Name For Ada, Michael Bell Available Car Linkedin, Motherboard Prices At Matrix, Noor Tagouri Instagram,