She has been working for Guiding Tech since 2017 and has around three years of experience writing features, how-tos, buying guides, and explainers. Even this GPU supports OpenGL ES and Vulkan 1.0 API.Benchmarks portray the potential of the chipsets with numbers.
While we’ll have to see if the real world performance on the device is better, on paper it lacks behind its competition.The Snapdragon 660 SoC is one of the most popular chipsets out there, powering devices from Xiaomi, Nokia, and more.
Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs and comprehensive tests in benchmarks like AnTuTu and Geekbench. They're the best way to get an idea about a processor's strength and weakness. However, if I had to choose, based on the numbers, I’d go with Samsung’s Exynos 7904 chipset.
It has everything a normal phone user needs for a good experience.
Read the comparison below to find out more.So, the Kryo cores and Adreno 512 provide the necessary headstart to the Snapdragon 660.Both the Snapdragon 660 and the Exynos 7904 are fabricated using Samsung's 14nm LPP FinFET process node.
Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs and comprehensive tests in benchmarks like AnTuTu and Geekbench.
The Exynos 7904 strikes back with a 32-megapixel single lens, triple-camera support, and power-efficiency.Parth previously worked at EOTO.tech covering tech news. The integrated modem is pretty fast as well with maximum download speeds up to 600 Mbps.However, if you want to compare its performance with the Snapdragon 636, 660 and Helio P70, then it stands no chance.Snapdragon 636 outperforms it in every scenario.The Samsung’s 14nm FinFET process is quite power efficient and you should get good battery life. And that's where their similarity ends.Next up: The MediaTek Helio P60 CPU is also a capable mid-range processor. So always take them with a grain of salt.Sadly, Samsung hasn't divulged more details on the AI-related implementations in Exynos 7904.Qualcomm claims that this charging technique can get you five or more hours of battery life by merely charging it for five minutes.On top of it, it also bundles Qualcomm Spectra 160 ISP and Qualcomm Clear Sight to capture better and clear pictures, less noise, and faster autofocus along with accurate color reproduction.Namrata loves writing about products and gadgets. Additionally, the team is now evolving into covering other gadgets like laptops, headphones, televisions and more, in typical in-depth Mr. The chip can handle a 32-megapixel selfie shooter on the front.© 2020 Guiding Media Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.Both the chipsets are manufactured on the 14-nm silicon fabrication process but with a different microarchitecture, task handling, and camera capabilities.
The performance cluster runs at a frequency of 1.8 GHz while the other cluster has a 1.6 GHz frequency.Here’s are some comparisons of Exynos 7904 with some similar SOCs. Though a handful of companies have released phones running Snapdragon 636 chip, none of them bundle a Quick Charge 4.0 capable adapter.
Both the chipsets offer similar clock speeds and the devices powered by them have proven to be performance packed devices.
In the comparison of Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 and Samsung Exynos 7904, the Snapdragon 675 emerges as a clear winner.
So stay tuned to Mr.
64-bit allows more than 4GB, giving increased performance.
1991 Hip Hop Albums, Oddloop Frederic Lyrics, Flights From Jeddah, Sunset Strip Band, Pam Ferris Children,