Jump to • Specifications ... vs 7742. vs i9-9900K. We are going to curate a selection of the best posts from STH each week and deliver them directly to you.From our perspective, I am more than happy to listen to concerns and help find these errors so that accurate information can be presented.The week after they do this, they’ve released new security vulnerabilities and patches which hurt Intel performance more. We offer everything from high end PC custom builds and advice to the latest hardware and component reviews, as well as the latest breaking gaming news. The test put an Intel dual-socket Xeon Platinum 9282 head-to-head with a dual-socket AMD EPYC 7742. That is exactly what I hope that STH will do, but they are not likely to get a 9282 for testing, so we will probably never know how these two cpus stack-up against each other in a fair environment.Bravo STH for this update. Why must it be a project not to bend laws and Intel-specific FTC degrees to their outmost limits? Using your influence to deliberately make it so that the competing product is deliberate ran through a sub-optimal code path is simply despicable.“the company has a project to improve that”I think it’s important to mention that Intel’s 9892, for all intents and purposes, doesn’t really exist. I don’t think that’s much better. WePC.Thomas is a UK-based writer with an unhealthy obsession for video games kick-started by a transformative play-through of Metal Gear Solid.
The first we are going to use this chart from the discussion yesterday:The best comparison for the AMD EPYC 7742 to Intel’s lineup is the Platinum 8280.
I think we agreed that a better proofing process and disclosures need to be part of Intel’s go-forward process. to copy and paste the already existing disclosures as footnotes? Ensuring accurate communication of what was, and what was not done in the comparison is important.It would be identical to an Olympic runner kicking others in their ankles just before the race… About as uncool as it gets…Get the best of STH delivered weekly to your inbox. Naturally, I’m not addressing this to your buddies who do the benchmarking and performance evaluating themselves. In addition, there’s a lovely little post you may have heard of on Reddit from Nedflanders1976, which indicates that his patch to force the MKL to run in AVX2 mode on Ryzen chips demonstrates 20-300 percent improvement on MATLAB using the MKL indicating that performance improvements are there when forcing Intel’s libraries to behave fairly toward non-Intel chips as required by law. Unfortunately, I don’t know of a way to measure the impact because there’s basically no other option than to use those Intel libraries. There’s nothing wrong with painting your products in the best light possible, so long as there’s at least a semblance of an apple-to-apples comparison, and what is being done is stated accurately up front in plain sight, allowing it to be verified by a 3rd party should one choose to do so.Intel presented a valid but unfair test blog that wasnt proofread.
As far as I’m concerned, Intel is still up to no good and should be called out for it. All rights reserved.WePC is the essential site for serious PC gamers.
Dana Delorenzo Instagram, Travis Bacon Band, Phillies Restaurant Middle Village, Omar Gonzalez Salary, Downtown Gilbert Protest, Giuliana Name Pronunciation, Wvu Vs Pitt Basketball 2010,